Mat Performance Tables 2017

It is based on measures of progress for mats with 3 or more academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2017 school performance tables.

Mat performance tables 2017.

Mat havering child left at school policy 2017 21. Please take care when drawing conclusions about a mat s improvement or fall in performance based on progress 8 alone. The government has today published its multi academy trust mat performance league tables based on 2017 exam results. Those schools had been with the mat for at least three academic years.

Performance tables ofsted reports policies. 5 not all schools that are able to teach pupils at the end of the key stage necessarily did so in 2017. For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years. More than half of mats fell below the average for progress 8 performance measures last year despite a slight improvement on the year before.

City of norwich school an ormiston academy. Key stage 2 mat performance in 2017 current year measures table 1. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort. Including the impact of a change to performance measures and a look at mat disadvantage figures.

Mat performance measures. Schools or colleges covering 16 18 study in this mat s performance data. Those with at least three schools that had results at either key stage 2 or key stage 4 as published in the 2017 school performance tables where 2. Hat exclusion policy mat complaints policy 2019 20.

Analysis on the performance of multi academy trusts mats.