There are built in problems with.
Mastering for vinyl vs cd.
See more louder features.
On a theoretical level there s just no reason it should be the case that vinyl sounds better.
But back to blood mountain one of the great record from past year.
Only way is to look at the dead wax if the guy cutting the record are leaving his signature.
For vinyl albums you re trying to add back the technical elements that were lost when the first record was pressed.
A nice explanation of some of the challenges of mastering vinyl.
It s gone through an entirely different mastering process and i m sorry to say in some cases without the original staff involved you know the original.
I would guess that the vinyl version only state same mastering engineer as the cd because they have not thinked about changing it.
Much of whether cd or vinyl sounds better will relate to your system the quality of your source and personal preference but there s reason there remains space and demand for both to exist in this era of ever improving streaming services and hi res downloads.
When mastering for vinyl they make sure certain frequencies of the overall album weren t too high or harsh.
Claiming that digital cd s sound harsh in comparison to analogue vinyl records.
For vinyl the optimum source is 24 bit dynamic and limited either extremely lightly or not at all.
I would guess the vinyl will sound better.
A cd has higher dynamic range than any vinyl 96db instead of about 60db vinyl has surface noise which is absent on cd which only gets worse as the record wears.
Why vinyl sounds better than cd.
In reality when making comparisons based purely on specification modern analogue to digital converters coupled with a larger dynamic range in the digital realm means that cd s are now.
The sequencing difference is that delivery from mastering for digital is either individual wav files for download or a single ddpi file for cd replication whereas for vinyl the delivery is generally two wav files one for each side of the record.